Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Appreciation for the Eclectic

Our third son, Andrew, is living and working in Seattle this summer, saving money for a university semester in France later this year. He’s our “global child,” you might say, always fascinated by the larger world around him. His favorite city so far? Venice. Hands down. But, to be honest, he was charmed by Stockholm last May. India? He wants to go. And to Rio, too. And Africa. And... well, you get the idea. Suitcases and long airplane trips are no problem for him.

Maybe that’s why his taste is so eclectic in, well, just about everything. He can dress up or dress down—and be comfortable with both. He can read fiction and non-fiction and enjoy. He can eat spicy or bland. No problem. And music? Well, he likes it all.

Which brings us back to his summer in Seattle—which is, after all, kind of an eclectic place, too. Famous for the “grunge” sound, Kurt Cobain, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and all of that, Seattle is also steeped in a proud classical tradition. Pacific Northwest Ballet, Seattle Opera, and the Seattle Symphony all rank among the nation’s best. Last week, Andrew went to a symphony concert at the stunning Benaroya Hall—a spectacular performance showcase in the heart of downtown—an architectural and acoustical wonder that opened in 1998.

One of Andrew’s cousins went along, too. They sat next to a young mom and her five-year old daughter, neither of whom they had met before. Antonin Dvorak’s Symphony No. 8 in G Major shared the bill with Paul Schoenfield’s Klezmer Rondos for Solo Flute and Chamber Orchestra. Forget the Mariner’s game at Safeco Field—this was a whole different show.

The young mom and her daughter didn’t know much about the music, but Andrew did. He explained the history and pedigree of the pieces, answered questions about the symphony, and marveled at the elegant presentation in the 2,500-seat Mark Taper Hall. He loved it. The people he met around him did, too. His cousin’s review was more mixed. The symphony wasn’t really her deal, so-to-speak, but she enjoyed exploring Benaroya for the first time with her cousin from Hoosierland, just the same. In the end, the music didn’t matter as much as the company. Family. New friends who had never met before. A new adventure, things to see, experiences to write home about.

The tickets were cheap—only $20 each. To walk through the jaw-dropping, four-story glass atrium (complete with Starbuck’s, of course), was worth that. And a glimpse of the sun setting across Elliott Bay through that glass was unforgettable. And the constant ribbon of car lights that whir around the downtown block that is Benaroya, surrounded by towering skyscrapers on three sides and Puget Sound on the other—well, very cool.

But, it was the company, the laughter, the listening, the conversation, and the relationships, that made the whole evening worthwhile.

That’s the way church should be, too, don’t you think? You may not always like the tempo of the music, or the balance of sound, or the way somebody else was “up front,” or, whatever. But, it’s the wonder of friendships—old and new—the laughter, the listening, the learning, the sharing, the relationships that make being part of a church family so worthwhile.

Benaroya is home to many genre of music. Pearl Jam—we’re talking rock with an edge here—even has an album: Live at Benaroya Hall. Jazz is big there, too. Even country. And, Chinese music (very different from the western music to which most of us are accustomed). But, the place welcomes everyone.

Madison Park is no Benaroya Hall—but, in these parts, it’s pretty close, Of course, it’s not a concert hall per se, it’s a house of worship, a house of prayer, and a meeting place for God’s people. All of ’em. That includes the ones who like the music loud—and those who like it soft. Those who like 19th century hymns and those who are drawn to today’s new tune. It includes those who like Dvorak and those who’ve never heard of him and don’t care and those, like Andrew, who like it all.

How eclectic are you? How respectful are you of the diversity of God’s church? How willing are you to defer to one another? How committed are you to the great legacy of unity and oneness that is the Church of God? Are you willing to develop friendships and worship with people whose taste may be substantially different from your own? Or, do you think everybody should just be happy with the way you like it, because, after all, it’s your hall, anyway?

Hmmm. I think it’s God’s hall. That’s why we call it the Madison Park Church of God. And, I think He has a lot more eclectic taste that I could ever imagine. And, if He’s happy, I’m happy. He is the audience, when you stop and think about it.

Maybe we just need to get out more - you know, and see the world. India? Haiti? Russia? Timbuktu? You’d be amazed at the different kinds of worship out there.

I love ya, Madison Park. All of ya. Each one. No matter what your musical trip might be.

8 comments:

Linda Elmore Teeple said...

I like your questions, Jim. And I like the concept of deferring to each other. There is so much we can learn from each other and it stretches us when we open our ears and minds and hearts to others. I really appreciated you sermon last Sunday. It left me with a good feeling -- a sense of peace, I think. In talking with others, I can tell you that it struck a positive cord with many others as well. Blessings, Linda

Anonymous said...

I enjoy the diversity of the worship service at Madison Park. But more than anything, I love the people and the friendships I've developed in the past few years. The style of worship is a small part for me... it's all about relationships and serving one another. I feel sooooo blessed to be a part of this church family. I love you all!! God Bless.

Unknown said...

Hi Jim,
As a musician, music speaks to me on a level I cannot compare with other forms of communication. I have always been able to appreciate all styles of musical worship, but have always felt something missing. I found that “Something” in our third service at North. The acceptance of moving and clapping, use of more modern musical motifs, and use of modern instrumentation made the worship much more fulfilling. It brought what I needed to help keep my interest and minister to me in a way that other genres could not, and still do not.
I do believe everyone can find a place in their hearts to be respectful of the many genres we see each Sunday in our new experience at Madison Park. However, as an individual I cannot deny that certain parts capture me, move me, and connect me more closely with God. I also cannot deny that I do miss having that fulfillment throughout the entire service, rather than just moments mixed into the new structure. As I look around the hall, It seems that many are having a similar experience. Those moved by vocal and symphonic music are struggling as they see bits of mainstream brought into their morning.
So as I ponder your writing and questions here, I find myself answering: Yes. I can appreciate the diversity. Yes, I can appreciate the many ways the Word is served. Yes, it’s God’s hall and I will accept everything served to me. But, I have found myself longing for that little “something” that brought me here and brought me closer to him.
In Love and Music,
R. Trumbull

hmb said...

i just visited your church today. i am 15 and attend pendleton heights. my parents dont go to church so i have to make my own efforts to get there. I some how talked someone into taking me to church. i herd of your church through one of my teachers. i really enjoyed everything about your church. i loved the atomsphere and the people are around me. most of all it was just enjoyable in general be in the house of the lord. your church shows the characteristics you mentioned. thank you so much to you and your staff for making madison park what the place it is today!
p.s i plan to revisit your church reguarly

Pastor Stevo said...

C.S. Lewis writes: There are two musical situations on which I think we can be confident that a blessing rests. One is where a priest or an organist, himself a man of trained and delicate taste, humbly and charitably sacrifices his own (aesthetically right) desires and gives the people humbler and coarser fare than he would wish, in a belief (even as it may be the erroneous belief) that he can thus bring them to God. The other is where the stupid and unmusical layman humbly and patiently, and above all silently, listens to music which he cannot, or cannot fully, appreciate, in the belief that it somehow glorifies God, and that if it does not edify him this must be his own defect. Neither such a High Brow nor such a Low Brow can be far out of the way. To both, Church Music will have been a means of grace: NOT the music they have liked, but the music they have DISLIKED. They have both offered, sacrificed, their taste in the fullest sense. But where the opposite situation arises, where the musician is filled with the pride of skill or the virus of emulation and looks with contempt on the unappreciative congregation, or where the unmusical, complacently entrenched in their own ignorance and conservatism, look with the restless and resentful hostility of an inferiority complex on all who would try to improve their taste--there, we may be sure, all that both offer is unblessed and the spirit that moves them is not the Holy Ghost.
These general relfections will not, I fear, be of much practical use to any priest or organist [music minister today] in devising a working compromise for a particular church. The most they can hope to do is to suggest that the problem is NEVER MERELY A MUSICAL ONE. Where both the choir [and praise band] and the congregation are spiritually on the right road no insurmountable difficulties will occur. Discrepancies of taste and capacity will, indeed, provide matter for mutual charity and humility.

Amen -- SW

Cush said...

I love the new format of the church service. The music is a part of the service that is important to me and my family. I want my children to grow up learning the new songs, but I also want to make sure that my kids learn the old classic church songs as well. So I hope we keep our mix of music so that everyone feels at home when they come to church.

We will keep singing!

Clint

DanaPort said...

This is not necessarily related to Jim's article, but I wanted to encourage anyone who missed the Wednesday evening service led by Jeff Matas last night to ask someone about the message.
Thanks, Jeff, for a truly inspirational message! I'm committed now to daily reminding myself that my role is servant to God's role of master.

Anonymous said...

I grew up in a congregation that featured a "conservative" style of worship most of the time. In my college and early married years I attended a congregation that featured a "contemporary" style of worship. This did not make me a crazy mixed up guy and it did not make me realize that I like one style better; it gave me the ability to enjoy both.

Since the contemporary style is always evolving, lots of energy could be expended in constantly trying to keep up with it. Just when we think we've arrived, the target has moved and someone else is more contemporary than we are! Maybe that energy is better spent on passionately worshiping the Lord in spirit and truth.

I am very glad for the maturity and the spirit of love I see in this whole discussion and in the attitude of the congregation each week. Something good is going on here. Or, perhaps I need to wear my glasses during worship.... : )